home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Encounters: The UFO Phenomenon, Exposed!
/
Encounters - The UFO Phenomenon, Exposed (1995).iso
/
abduct
/
abduc116.txt
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1993-07-25
|
12KB
|
246 lines
Abduction Digest, Number 85
Thursday, February 4th 1993
(C) Copyright 1992 Paranet Information Service. All Rights Reserved.
Today's Topics:
Ideas...
Abduction Investigation (2)
Re: Abduction Digest 81
Delaware Talk
Re: Abduction Digest 81
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Steve.Gresser@f100.n1012.z9.FIDONET.ORG (Steve Gresser)
Subject: Ideas...
Date: 3 Feb 93 00:49:00 GMT
> occurred to show this in progress. I also noted that at times some of
> the victims reported a fluid left behind but it often disappeared or
> washed off and was not retrieved.
Considering the allegations regarding the conduct of these aliens, could we not
assume that what is left behind is semen, or even alien semen? If it is in fact
the alien equivilant of semen, THAT would be quite a catch! We'd be able to
examine, if not them directly, thier genetic makeup (assuming they have one!)
and thier primary fluidic makeup (if not water or some water-like substance).
Do the descriptions of this fluid become in any way explicit?
Thanks,
Steve
--
Steve Gresser - via ParaNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: Steve.Gresser@f100.n1012.z9.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: David.Jacobs@p0.f21.n1010.z9.FIDONET.ORG (David Jacobs)
Subject: Abduction Investigation (2)
Date: 3 Feb 93 06:42:06 GMT
Sheldon,
Although it is impossible to tell exactly what has happened to this woman,
it does sound like she has been through the mill. You have done a good job in
obtaining some of the more dramatic and perhaps terrifying incidents in her
life that she consciously remembers. My best guess is that there is probably
much more. Her medical history is useful, especially her ear and nose bleeds,
gynecological problems, and other unusual medical sequelae. Being sexually
abused probably mirrors the society and one must be very careful not to place
too much emphasis on this as a causative factor for the other events. What have
you decided to do in the future? Are you going forward with hypnosis? Do you
have a competent hypnotist who thoroughly understands the abduction phenomenon?
The woman might also need psychological counseling and a good therapist is
always essential in this regard.
So far, you seem to be on top of the situation and I hope that the woman
can have a satisfactory resolution to her problems. Please keep me posted about
what is happening with her. If you drop me a line, I might be able to send you
the name of a therapist or hypnotist in your area (if there is anyone) who is
at least interested in the subject, if not expert in it.
--
David Jacobs - via ParaNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: David.Jacobs@p0.f21.n1010.z9.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: David.Jacobs@p0.f21.n1010.z9.FIDONET.ORG (David Jacobs)
Subject: Re: Abduction Digest 81
Date: 3 Feb 93 07:19:19 GMT
David,
One does not enter into UFO or abduction research for the money. Anyone
who has been in it for any length of time will tell you that. The
amount of money that both Budd Hopkins and I have have spent in
out-of-pocket expenses is enormous. Until very recently there has been
absolutely no funding for any aspect of UFO research from established
funding institutions. This is a "negative cash flow" research
enterprise. Having been involved with this for over twenty-seven years,
I can absolutely tell you that only the naive and\or cynical think that
there is a living to be made in UFO research, Strieber notwithstanding.
I fail to understand why you find it curious that the only way you can
find out about UFOs or abductions is through books and magazines. UFO
researchers have had the normal channels of scholarly communication
closed off to them from the beginning. They have been forced to write
articles for periodicals founded for that purpose. I am not sure,
however, exactly what your stance is. Should we not write articles and
books? Should we keep our information to ourselves and not share it
with other researchers? Should we not attend UFO conferences and give
papers? I am not sure what you have in mind, or what you find
objectionable.
Budd and I have written four books between us about the UFO and
abduction phenomenon. It is an effective and lasting way of
making the public aware of this most important of all phenomena. The
Linda case is enormously complex. Articles cannot do it justice, only a
full-length book will. In spite of this, Budd has given various talks
about the case and published several articles about it. I am not going
to get into a long treatise about the Linda case. Suffice it to say
that all researchers in the social sciences publish books and write
articles about their work. There is no difference with this area. Both
Budd and I do our own hypnosis of abductees. In my opinion, this is a
very difficult and specialized area of research. I know that I find
myself consulting with psychiatrists, psychologists, clinical social
workers, and hypnotherapists from around the country on a regular basis.
Basically, they have someone whom they have been seeing who tells them
of abduction phenomena that has happened to them. They are at a loss as
to how to proceed and want to learn about the problems of abduction
research and therapy, the proper methods of hypnosis, and the like.
Budd and I along with John Carpenter have been conducting workshops
for therapists for the same reasons (next one in Atlanta). I have found
a wide spectrum of expertize and competence in this area and it does not
matter what the profession of the researcher or hypnotist is. We have
found entirely incompetent psychiatrists and excellent hypnotherapists.
We have found inept psychologists and extremely helpful and sincere UFO
researchers who want to help. Thus one's profession is not a good
predictor of how one will fare with this subject.
-- David Jacobs - via ParaNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: David.Jacobs@p0.f21.n1010.z9.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: David.Jacobs@p0.f21.n1010.z9.FIDONET.ORG (David Jacobs)
Subject: Delaware Talk
Date: 3 Feb 93 07:28:04 GMT
Trying to obtain an abduction on videotape has proved to be
frustrating. I and other researchers have found the same problem: wires
pulled out, camera turned off, power outage in the room or house, and
the like. The best idea that I have heard so far, short of aiming
a camera into unsuspecting abductee's bedroom from a nearby house or
apartment, is to build a device in which a video camera and\or VCR is
connected to a pressure plate underneath one's mattress. When a person
gets out of bed the pressure plate completes a circuit which is
attached to a five minute timer. After five minutes, the video camera is
turned on in the record mode. Thus we may not get the beginning of the
abduction but we may get the end. There will be no electronic equipment
on during the abduction phase, and if the person gets up to go to the
bathroom, there will be enough time to get back into bed without
tripping the camera.
--
David Jacobs - via ParaNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: David.Jacobs@p0.f21.n1010.z9.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: David.Jacobs@p0.f21.n1010.z9.FIDONET.ORG (David Jacobs)
Subject: Re: Abduction Digest 81
Date: 3 Feb 93 07:19:19 GMT
David,
One does not enter into UFO or abduction research for the money.
Anyone who has been in it for any length of time will tell you that.
The amount of money that both Budd Hopkins and I have have spent in
out-of-pocket expenses is enormous. Until very recently there has been
absolutely no funding for any aspect of UFO research from established
funding institutions. This is a "negative cash flow" research
enterprise. Having been involved with this for over twenty-seven years,
I can absolutely tell you that only the naive and\or cynical think that
there is a living to be made in UFO research, Strieber notwithstanding.
I fail to understand why you find it curious that the only way you
can find out about UFOs or abductions is through books and magazines.
UFO researchers have had the normal channels of scholarly communication
closed off to them from the beginning. They have been forced to write
articles for periodicals founded for that purpose. I am not sure,
however, exactly what your stance is. Should we not write articles and
books? Should we keep our information to ourselves and not share it
with other researchers? Should we not attend UFO conferences and give
papers?
I am not sure what you have in mind, or what you find objectionable.
Budd and I have written four books between us about the UFO and
abduction phenomenon. It is an effective and lasting way of making the
public aware of this most important of all phenomena. The Linda case
is enormously complex. Articles cannot do it justice, only a full-length
book will. In spite of this, Budd has given various talks about the case
and published several articles about it. I am not going to get into a
long treatise about the Linda case. Suffice it to say that all
researchers in the social sciences publish books and write articles
about their work. There is no difference with this area. Both Budd and
I do our own hypnosis of abductees. In my opinion, this is a very
difficult and specialized area of research. I know that I find
myself consulting with psychiatrists, psychologists, clinical social
workers, and hypnotherapists from around the country on a regular basis.
Basically, they have someone whom they have been seeing who tells them
of abduction phenomena that has happened to them. They are at a loss as
to how to proceed and want to learn about the problems of abduction
research and therapy, the proper methods of hypnosis, and the like.
Budd and I along with John Carpenter have been conducting workshops for
therapists for the same reasons (next one in Atlanta). I have found a
wide spectrum of expertize and competence in this area and it does not
matter what the profession of the researcher or hypnotist is. We have
found entirely incompetent psychiatrists and excellent hypnotherapists.
We have found inept psychologists and extremely helpful and sincere UFO
researchers who want to help. Thus one's profession is not a good
predictor of how one will fare with this subject.
-- David Jacobs - via ParaNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: David.Jacobs@p0.f21.n1010.z9.FIDONET.ORG
*******************************************************************************
Submissions abduct@scicom.alphacdc.com
Administrative requests abduct-request@scicom.alphacdc.com
FTP archive grind.isca.uiowa.edu:/info/paranet/abduct
Permission to distribute Michael.Corbin@paranet.org
Private mail to Paranet/Fidonet users firstname.lastname@paranet.org
UUCP gateway {ncar,isis,csn}!scicom
********************End**of**the**Abduction**Newsletter************************